The sulphonylurea group of drugs and the biguanide drug metformin have both been available for use as glucose-lowering therapies for more than 50 years. There were, however, few other clinically relevant developments in this area of pharmacotherapy until about the year 2000. At that time a new class of glucose-lowering therapies, the thiazolidinediones pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, was launched. In 2007 two more new classes of therapy were launched, the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) mimetics; both of these classes of agents work on the incretin pathway.A further new class of glucose-lowering agents, the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, is likely to be launched in the next year or two. So much activity in glucose lowering pharmacotherapy in this past 12 years perhaps makes up for the previous 40 years of relative inactivity!In this article we discuss new glucose-lowering therapies and consider their place in diabetes management from the primary care perspective.
New glucose-lowering therapies for diabetes: a review
Keeping on track for good concordance with CVD and diabetes drugs
What is important when a nurse and patient are together in a consultation? Most of us have had consultations where the discussion did not appear to achieve anything, while, on other occasions, both parties seemed to be working well together. This article looks at how to share the process of planning treatment with a patient to improve health outcomes; it examines what concordance is, and how to achieve it, looking at how this might work out in practice.
Patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome – management recommendations for reducing cardiovascular risk
Patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome – management recommendations for reducing cardiovascular risk – Richard Hobbs, Eleanor McGregor, John Betteridge
Diabetes mellitus, in particular type 2 diabetes but also type 1 diabetes after the age of 40, confers substantial cardiovascular risk. In people with diabetes, at least in those who have had the disease for a few years, and no history of coronary heart disease, the risk of myocardial infarction is similar to that in non-diabetic patients with manifest cardiovascular disease. Intensive management of cardiovascular risk factors is, therefore, widely recommended for individuals with diabetes.
Testosterone and type 2 diabetes: the forgotten link
The recommendation by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)1 that men with type 2 diabetes should be assessed annually for erectile dysfunction (ED) may have far-reaching implications. Unfortunately, this is the only significant piece of NICE guidance not yet introduced into the GP Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) for 2010.1,2 Although NICE incorrectly classified ED as a neuropathic complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D) rather than a macrovascular, microvascular, endocrine and neuropathic process, the implication of the suggested full assessment of these men is important.
Multifactorial intervention in diabetes care: ‘At-A-Glance’ analysis of evidence
An understanding of evidence-based medicine and how to implement it in clinical practice is now crucial for all professionals involved in the delivery of healthcare. New evidence-based publications are constantly being developed to meet health professionals’ needs for clear, concise and up-to-date information.
In this issue we will review the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) 38 and the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) using the ‘At-A-Glance’ format, as below:
A AcronymT Title and reference
A Aim and introduction
G GroupL Limb and endpointsA Absolute riskN Number needed to treat (NNT)C Clinical conclusionE Education for patient
Individualising patient care with the new NICE guideline
In 2008, NICE published a comprehensive guideline on the management of type 2 diabetes which took a patient-centred approach to care and updated recommendations on the management of blood glucose, blood pressure, lipids, thrombosis, renal function and retinopathy. A number of new and emerging therapies for blood glucose management were not included at the time and the recent publication of NICE Clinical guideline 87 provides valuable recommendations on when and where these drugs should be used in the care pathway. They give more options for healthcare professionals and their patients with type 2 diabetes at a time of ongoing change in management of the condition.
Achieving effective lipid management in diabetes
People with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and management of diabetic dyslipidaemia is an essential part of diabetes management. The Joint British Societies’ 2 (JBS2) guidelines established the lipid targets of 4 mmol/L for total cholesterol and 2 mmol/L for LDL-cholesterol for people with type 2 diabetes and those with CVD. These lower targets for people with CVD were adopted by the NICE lipid modification guideline (CG67) in 2008, and the new NICE guideline for the management of type 2 diabetes continues this emphasis on lower lipid targets.
New drugs and where they fit in the treatment algorithm
In May 2009, NICE published recommendations on the use of newer agents for the control of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes. This guideline provides a partial update for NICE Clinical Guideline 66 on the management of type 2 diabetes that was published last year. These newer agents include the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) mimetic exenatide and the long-acting insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin glargine).
New guideline provides a breath of fresh air that helps to individualise diabetes care
Type 2 diabetes patient with muscle aches on statin therapy
Type 2 diabetes patient without CVD, not achieving lipid targets
Postprandial hyperglycaemia: red herring or red flag?
Several studies have suggested that postprandial rather than fasting hyperglycaemia may be a major determinant of cardiovascular risk. This article reviews the importance of postprandial hyperglycaemia and explores the benefits and risks of managing postprandial hyperglycaemia aggressively in order to prevent diabetes-related complications.